Stupid People
On Bill C-484, in response to an op-ed written by Vicki Saporta, this blogger (The impatient patient) writes a very interesting, insightful and sometimes outright hilarious article, I dislike Stupid People : a) Exactly how does Saporta know that it is a "fact" that the legislation will have "negligible deterrent effect"? b) Again, why is she trying to scare us by claiming the Bill could "drastically change Canadian law"? Why is this a bad thing? Why is this supposed to scare us? Laws change all the time. BFD. c) Saporta is arguing against this Bill by saying that a similar law in the U.S. has not resulted in a reduction of violence against women. This is the argument that angered me most. Let's be very clear on something. The purpose of the law is not, repeat IS NOT to reduce violence against pregnant women. That is where Saporta is 100% wrong. The purpose of the law is to fairly and properly punish people who injure or kill a pregnant woman (which mea...