Shrugging at the loss of life

In a previous post, I mentioned this article; So what if abortion ends a life?

In the February 15, 2013 edition of The National Post, Denise McComish comments on this new attitude of shrugging at the loss of life:
You can’t ask for more clarity than a headline that cuts straight to the chase. A recent Salon article titled  “So what if abortion ends a life?” provides startling yet honest insight into an emerging justification for abortion. Its author, Mary Elizabeth Williams, correctly states that a fetus is a human life yet asserts that this does not diminish her support for abortion in the least. According to her, “all life is not equal”. Some human beings, it would follow, are more equal than others, an argument we’re beginning to hear said out loud.


Read more here: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/02/14/denise-mccomish-abortions-new-argument-shrugs-at-the-loss-of-life/

Comments

  1. When progressives shrug at the loss of human life, they undermine their own philosophy. If we shouldn't care about one set of human beings, why should we care about any particular group? If their lives aren't worthwhile, why should women's, or gays, or anyone else's?

    I like the re-design, by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Exactly... I was thinking to myself... "and why would the elderly's lives be worth anything anymore either?" It's a dangerous philosophy.

    And thanks. I think I like it too :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sectes

Crashing into Thin Air - Excerpt From Chapter Seven

Problems in Bolivia